Walgreens, CVS and Walmart.Photo: Getty Images (3)
A federal judge in Ohio has ruled that Walmart, CVS and Walgreens must pay two counties in the state a combinedamount of about $650.6 million in damages over the course of the next 15 years, in relation to the opioid crisis and their alleged part in it.
CBS Newsreported that in U.S. District Judge Dan A. Polster’s ruling Wednesday, he wrote that the companies had “squandered the opportunity to present a meaningful plan to abate the nuisance.” The funds were awarded to Lake and Trumbull counties, near Cleveland.
The three major chains also must adopt new protocols, including training employees on dispensing controlled substances, creating hotlines where patients and employees can report improper pill sales, and designating a controlled substance compliance officer who will review the processes of prescription-validation,The Washington Postsaid.
The paper explained that federal law dictates that pharmacies are supposed to determine if prescriptions have been issued for a legitimate use before issuing them.
Lawyers representing Lake and Trumbull counties argued that these three pharmacies oversupplied in these areas with more pills than could have been medically needed, thePostcontinued. The paper said that lawyers have estimated that from 2012-2016, pharmacies dispensed 61 million pills in Lake County, which would be enough to give every man, woman and child 265 pills.
Wednesday’s ruling follows a jury verdict last November which found that the companies had played a role in the crisis in both counties, thePostandThe New York Timessaid. According to theTimes, that ruling said the companies had continued to dispense large amounts of prescription painkillers despite signs they were being abused.
In a Wednesday statement posted to their website following the ruling,Walmartwrote, “Plaintiffs' attorneys sued Walmart in search of deep pockets, and this judgment follows a trial that was engineered to favor the plaintiffs' attorneys and was riddled with remarkable legal and factual mistakes. We will appeal.”
Oxycodone opioid tablets.Getty Images
The statement continued, “Instead of addressing the real causes of the opioid crisis, like pill mill doctors, illegal drugs and regulators asleep at the switch, plaintiffs' lawyers wrongly claimed that pharmacists must second-guess doctors in a way the law never intended and many federal and state health regulators say interferes with the doctor-patient relationship.”
Jim Cohn, a spokesperson for Walgreens, told PEOPLE in a statement that they too intend to appeal the decision.
“We are disappointed with this outcome,” the statement said. “The facts and the law did not support the jury verdict last fall, and they do not support the court’s decision now. The court committed significant legal errors in allowing the case to go before a jury on a flawed legal theory that is inconsistent with Ohio law and compounded those errors in reaching its ruling regarding damages.”
“As we have said throughout this process, we never manufactured or marketed opioids nor did we distribute them to the “pill mills” and internet pharmacies that fueled this crisis,” the release read. “The plaintiffs' attempt to resolve the opioid crisis with an unprecedented expansion of public nuisance law is misguided and unsustainable.”
Michael DeAngelis, a spokesperson for CVS, also said the chain would be appealing in a statement to PEOPLE.
According to theCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, nearly half a million people died between 1999–2019 from an overdose involving any opioid. This includes both prescription and “illicit” opioids.
If you or someone you know is struggling with substance abuse, please contact the SAMHSA helpline at 1-800-662-HELP.
source: people.com
