A meta - analysis of studies on the effects of antidepressant on children and teenagers has find almost no benefits comparative to placebo . A small welfare was found for fluoxetine hydrocholoride , marketed as Prozac , but this was sufficiently borderline as to be clear to call into question . The findings come on top of late research showing these drugs are associate with adoubling of the riskof self-annihilation and aggression in the same age groups .

Dr. Andrea Ciprianiof the University of Oxford looked at peer - look back studies on the upshot of antidepressants for children and adolescents diagnosed with major depressive upset . InThe Lancet , Dr. Cipriani and his co - authors compose : “ Trials levy participant with intervention - insubordinate depressive disorder , handling duration of less than 4 week , or an overall sample sizing of less than ten patients were take out . ” This leave 34 trials of 14 drug on a sum of 5,260 participant .

After taking the calibre of evidence give into chronicle , the author account : “ Only Sarafem was statistically significantly more efficient than placebo . ” They conclude : “ When considering the endangerment – welfare profile of antidepressant drug in the piercing treatment of major depressive disorderliness , these drugs do not seem to offer a absolved reward for child and teen . ”

Substantial differences were found between the drugs , but mostly in the class of their harm . Imipramine , venlafaxine , and duloxetine demo enough side effects to be frequently discontinued , while venlafaxine had a disturbingly strong association with self-destructive view . Some of the other drugs lack sufficient data on this point to reach conclusions . Considering that 22 of the trials were funded by pharmaceutical companies , autonomous assessments may have been bad .

The findings may come as a shock absorber to teen and their families . However , for many years a grow dead body of medical researchers and therapists have been express alert at the far-flung ethical drug of Selective Serotonin Re - uptake Inhibitors ( SSRIs ) to people whose brains have not to the full developed .

These drug are expensive to contribute to market place , but so garish to produce once sanction that pharmaceutical companies have a huge incentive to expand their market as much as possible . This can lead to pushes for prescriptions to masses they wo n’t help

The length company will go to in Holy Order to gain commendation for SSRIs to be order to adolescents was revealed last class . A reevaluation of the note from a clinical trial found 11 teenager on the SSRI paroxetine hadattempted suicide , something mysteriously leave out of the original report .

“ Without access to individual - level data it is unmanageable to get exact effect estimate and we ca n’t be completely confident about the accuracy of the information contained in published and unpublished trials , ” Cipriani said in astatement .   “ It has been widely reason that there needs to be a shift of live scientific acculturation to one where responsible data sharing should be the norm . ”

ProfessorJon Jureidiniof the University of Adelaide print anaccompanying commentin the same variant .

Jureidini told IFLScience that while many young mass improve after being given SSRIs , the drugs are seldom responsible .   “ Some of it isreversion to the mean value , some of it is placebo outcome … The big impact broker is the relationship with the healer , ” he sound out . “ If a Dr. can establish this it may well be enough [ to produce betterment ] without order drug . ”

Part of the problem , Jureidini argued , is that clinical depression is a “ verbal description masquerade as an explanation ” , and that many people bear witness depressive symptom are in need of modification to their “ psychosocial circumstance ” rather than a tablet , but this is harder for a Dr. to attain .